Monday, 2 June 2014

WWE Raw: Live Results, Reaction and Analysis for June 2 - Bleacher Report

Welcome to Bleacher Report's live WWE Raw coverage for June 2.

This week's show was taped in England, so the results are available since it airs later in the United States. But for those who do not like spoilers, this is your source for play-by-play and analysis.

Payback is officially in our rearview mirror, and now it's time to start building toward Money in the Bank.

All the champions who defended their titles retained them at Payback, John Cena found a creative way to keep Bray Wyatt down for the 10-count and The Shield won with a clean sweep over Evolution in their elimination match.

We also saw Rusev defeat Big E, Hornswoggle get his hair cut and Kane make an appearance to attack Kofi Kingston for what appeared to be no reason other than reminding people he is still around.

Tonight's Raw will feature all the fallout from Payback as well as signal which feuds may continue and which ones have come to an end.

How will Stephanie McMahon respond to being embarrassed by Brie Bella?

Will Daniel Bryan continue to defy The Authority and hold on to his title?

What will be Cody Rhodes' and Goldust's next moves after apparently breaking up?

Is Alicia Fox still going to pursue the Divas title after coming up short?

And lastly, will WWE stop trying to make us think El Torito's tail grows back?

Make sure to bookmark this page and come back Monday night at the start of WWE Raw at 8 p.m. ET. Bleacher Report will have answers to these questions and live coverage of all the action!

Thanks for reading, and follow me on Twitter: @BR_Doctor.

Blackhawks

Ann B Davis

Chris Brown

Belmont Stakes

Ann B Davis

LeBron: Heat ready for challenge - ESPN

MIAMI -- LeBron James heard Tim Duncan's comments when the NBA Finals rematch was finally set and fully understood them, even though he wasn't bothered by them.

After the San Antonio Spurs clinched a meeting with the Miami Heat, Duncan made a strong statement when he said: "We're excited about it. We've got four more to win. We'll do it this time."

James said he wasn't bothered by the comments and called the entire Spurs organization "professional," but he certainly understood the message being sent.

"They don't like us, they don't. I can sense it from Timmy's comments over the last couple of days," James said after the Heat held an extended practice on Monday. "They wanted this, they wanted us and we'll be ready for the challenge."

After blowing a five-point lead in the final minute of Game 6 last season when the Larry O'Brien Trophy had been wheeled to the edge of the court and yellow tape prepared for the postgame celebration, the Spurs have lived with the disappointment for a year. Which is why Duncan added: "We're happy it's the Heat again. We've got that bad taste in our mouths still."

"[Duncan's comments] don't bother me. Once you get on the floor, you've got to play. We're confident. We're not shying away from them. We want them, too," James said. "I don't think it's personal. Like they said, we left a sour taste in their mouth."

Unlike in the last round when the Heat ended up in a frustrating back-and-forth with the Indiana Pacers, particularly Lance Stephenson, there was no edge in James' tone. After getting back to the Finals in 2012 after a bitter loss the previous year, James can relate to the Spurs and is taking a very level-headed approach into the series.

"They've been preparing for this moment, we have as well," James said. "No one is entitled. This is no one's championship. It isn't ours, it isn't theirs, it's two teams fighting for it."

OTF Nunu

Oberyn Martell

Ann B Davis

Wildstar

LA Kings

Questions swirl after Bowe Bergdahl's release - CNN

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • NEW: Feinstein: Lawmakers should've gotten heads-up about prisoner swap
  • NEW: Rogers: Decision to swap prisoners without telling Congress "doesn't smell right"
  • Soldier's release generates controversy and questions
  • Some say the deal puts Americans at greater risk; others question Bergdahl's disappearance

(CNN) -- After five years in captivity, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is free. But that's hardly the end of the story. While the Idaho man's friends and family and the Obama administration are hailing his release, the deal that set him free is getting heat from critics who say Bergdahl is a traitor who cost American lives and those who say the deal could cost American lives in the future.

A captive U.S. soldier returns home ... sounds like a good thing. Why are some people so upset?

Some fear that the deal will encourage hostage-taking and open a new era in which the United States has to negotiate with terrorists. Others say the administration may have broken the law by failing to notify Congress that it was letting terror detainees free from the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Still others -- many of them Bergdahl's fellow soldiers -- are queasy about the whole thing because of the questions that continue to swirl around his disappearance and claims that he may have deserted his post.

Don't other countries make such swaps? Hasn't the United States?

Of course. Prisoner exchanges have been a feature of many U.S. conflicts going back to the Revolutionary War. And no student of Cold War history could overlook the exchange of U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers for a Russian spy in 1962, or of the several cloak-and-dagger spy exchanges conducted on Germany's Glienicke Bridge. Other countries, notably Israel, have also been known to negotiate prisoner swaps to gain the release of captive soldiers.

One controversy here is a U.S. law that requires the administration to give Congress notice 30 days before releasing any detainees from the military prison at Guantanamo Bay. National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Sunday on CNN that the "acute urgency" of Bergdahl's failing health and what she described as a narrow opportunity to win his freedom justified making the move without notifying Congress.

On Monday, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough defended the administration's handling of the negotiations, saying Congress had known for years of negotiations for Bergdahl's release, including the possibility that detainees might be released.

But several U.S. lawmakers on Monday criticized the White House's approach.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters on Capitol Hill Monday that lawmakers on her committee should have been given a heads-up about the prisoner swap.

"We had participated in a number of briefings some time ago, and there (were) considerable concerns," the California Democrat said.

Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman the House Intelligence Committee, said he planned to look into whether Obama broke the law by not notifying Congress 30 days in advance.

"I think it certainly merits further review, and that's what I'm going to do to make that determination," the Michigan Republican told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "It certainly doesn't smell right to me."

So who is this guy, and how did he wind up getting captured, anyway?

Friends describe him as a trustworthy and outgoing world traveler who joined the Army in 2008. How he ended up captive remains a bit of a mystery. U.S. officials have declined to go into detail, but soldiers in his platoon say he was pulling guard duty when he put down his weapons and walked off base. He reportedly had sent e-mails to his parents denouncing U.S. activities in Afghanistan, according to 2012 reporting by late Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings.

What are the soldiers who served with him saying?

Bluntly, they resent any talk of Bergdahl as a hero. They say he's a deserter who should be put on trial, especially in light of the deaths of at least six U.S. soldiers killed while looking for him.

"I was pissed off then and I am even more so now with everything going on," said Matt Vierkant, who was in the same platoon as Bergdahl. "Bowe Bergdahl deserted during a time of war and his fellow Americans lost their lives searching for him."

"I don't understand why we're trading prisoners at Gitmo for somebody who deserted during a time of war, which is an act of treason," Vierkant said.

Are they right? Was he a deserter?

U.S. officials aren't saying that, at least not directly. When asked about the issue Sunday, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel sidestepped the question. "Our first priority is assuring his well-being and his health and getting him reunited with his family," Hagel said. "Other circumstances that may develop and questions, those will be dealt with later."

On Monday, Pentagon spokesman Adm. John Kirby said U.S. officials "still don't have a complete picture of what caused him to leave his base that night."

"But let's not forget, he was held captive as a prisoner for five years. Five years by himself," Kirby said. "That's a pretty high price to pay for whatever impelled him to walk off that base."

So what's next for him?

He's at an American military hospital in Germany being evaluated by doctors and facing a lengthy repatriation and reintegration process.

He's in stable condition "receiving treatment for conditions that require hospitalization," Landstuhl Regional Medical Center said in a statement. Beyond saying he requires attention to "dietary and nutrition needs," the hospital didn't elaborate, citing medical privacy requirements.

"The Landstuhl staff is sensitive to what Sgt. Bergdahl has been through and will proceed with his reintegration at a pace with which he is comfortable," the hospital said.

Those in charge of treating Bergdahl are working to build up his confidence in them, a senior Defense Department official said, noting that Bergdahl hasn't been able to trust anyone for five years.

Doctors in Germany are evaluating his health and whether he's ready to be transported, said Arwen Consaul, a spokeswoman for U.S. Army South.

Once doctors give the OK, a receiving team will travel there to facilitate his transport to Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas. From there, he'll head to the San Antonio Military Medical Center, where a room is already ready for Bergdahl and a support team is standing by, Consaul said.

He hasn't yet talked to his family, Kirby said.

"That will obviously occur, but it won't occur until I think everybody believes it's the right time," he said.

The first meeting between Bergdahl and his parents may only last minutes, Consaul said, depending on what psychologists recommend.

Once in the United States, she said, Bergdahl's daily routine will focus on four key areas: medical care, psychological support, debriefings and family support.

"This is to help a person who has had no control of their own life for years now regain that control step by step," she said.

Is it true he's having trouble speaking English? Why?

Yes, according to a senior Defense Department official, but the reasons for it aren't clear.

It may be that he hasn't used English since he was captured, instead speaking to his captors in Pashtun, the local language.

Roy Hallums, a private contractor held by Iraqi insurgents for 10 months, said he didn't have trouble readjusting to English, but said he couldn't talk for a while because he had been forced to stay silent under threat of death.

"It's like your vocal chords are like your muscles in your arms. If they don't get any use, they get out of shape," he told CNN's "New Day."

What about these detainees the U.S. let go? Should we worry about them?

According to senior U.S. officials, they're mid- to high-level officials from the Taliban regime that ruled Afghanistan when the United States invaded the country. They include figures said to be linked to the late terror leader Osama bin Laden, his al Qaeda terror network and to abuses inside Afghanistan during the Taliban's rule.

But Kirby said Monday that U.S. officials have received assurances from Qatari officials that the men "were not going to pose a direct threat to the national security of the United States."

He declined to go into detail, but according to a senior defense official, they will be subject to Qatari supervision and a one-year travel ban.

Should we expect any more prisoner swaps or releases?

There aren't any other U.S. military personnel being held, so there won't be any more swaps involving troops, at least. But it's possible that Bergdahl's release presages a broader release of Afghan citizens from Guantanamo Bay, said CNN terrorism analyst Peter Bergen.

"At the end of hostilities, both sides typically swap prisoners, and we're coming to the end of conventional hostilities between these two groups," he said.

The State Department said Monday that the swap for Bergdahl doesn't set a precedent for other detained U.S. military or diplomatic personnel, like former State Department contractor Alan Gross in Cuba or Korean-American missionary Kenneth Bae in North Korea.

"We look at each case differently," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters.

Bergdahl "is a member of the military who was detained during an armed conflict. That, obviously, is a unique circumstance," she said. "In any case, whether it's Alan Gross or Kenneth Bae or others who are detained American citizens, we take every step possible to make the case and to ... take steps to ensure their return home to the United States."

What's next for Bergdahl?

Fellow soldiers call Bergdahl a deserter, not a hero

CNN's Martin Savidge, Elise Labott, Ted Barrett and Craig Broffman contributed to this report.

OTF Nunu

Blackhawks

Blackhawks

WWE

Bowe Bergdahl

Sunday, 1 June 2014

Bowe Bergdahl, American Soldier, Freed by Taliban in Prisoner Trade - New York Times


USA TODAY

Bowe Bergdahl, American Soldier, Freed by Taliban in Prisoner Trade
New York Times
The soldier, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, 28, was handed over to American Special Operations troops inside Afghanistan near the Pakistan border about 10:30 a.m. Saturday in a tense but uneventful exchange with 18 Taliban officials, Ame rican officials said.
Bowe Bergdahl's parents: Our son faces a long recoveryUSA TODAY
Bowe Bergdahl's family praises release, sends love via news mediaLos Angeles Times
Tears of joy: Idaho hometown of Bowe Bergdahl prepares homecomingCNN
NBCNews.com -TIME
all 2,847 news articles »

Lance Stephenson

Spurs

ANN B DAVIS

Bowe Bergdahl

Miami Heat

NBA Approves Clippers Sale, Pending Approval - ESPN

Updated: May 31, 2014, 2:33 AM ET

ESPN.com news services

The NBA has approved former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's $2 billion bid to buy the Los Angeles Clippers, the league said in a statement Friday night.

The sale is subject to approval from the league's owners before it can be finalized.

Tuesday's scheduled NBA Board of Governors meeting has been canceled. Shelly Sterling had pushed to negotiate a sale before the meeting, at which both of the Sterlings' ownership interests could have been terminated.

As part of the sale agreement, Shelly Sterling and the Sterling family trust have agreed not to sue the NBA and to absolve the league of litigation by others, including Donald Sterling. There also is language in the agreement that states Ballmer will not move the team from Los Angeles, according to a source with knowledge of the deal.

Shelly's husband, Donald, filed a $1 billion lawsuit against the league earlier Friday.

Donald Sterling's attorney, Max Blecher, said he needed to review all the new information before proceeding.

"We gotta sit down and see how all of this affects us," Blecher told ESPN.com's Ramona Shelburne. "We have to think through the whole situation. 

"[Shelly's] saying, 'If you sue us, we'll have to pay out of our own money.' It's like suing themselves. We have to see whether the law allows that to happen."

The $2 billion price tag is the most by far for an NBA team, topping the $550 million paid for the Milwaukee Bucks earlier this year, and ranks among the highest ever for a North American professional sports franchise. Ballmer defended the amount of his bid in an interview with the Los Angeles Times on Friday, saying he would be paying, in part, for the Clippers' potential value.

"I've got big dreams for the team," he told the Times. "I'd love to win a championship. I'd love the Clippers to be the most dynamic, vibrant team and name in professional sports."

Ballmer added: "The only way any of this makes sense -- my desire to spend time in Los Angeles, this team, its aspirations, this community, this purchase price, any of that -- is to really live out the dream and make this kind of America's team."

Ballmer also confirmed to the Times that another part of the sale agreement was to recognize Shelly Sterling with a sort of "owner-emeritus" status, which would make her welcome at Clippers games. Her husband, on the other hand, was given a lifetime ban from the NBA, in addition to a $2.5 million fine, and is not permitted to attend games.

Rom Klempner, the acting director of the National Basketball Players Association, lauded Ballmer in a 467-word letter to players about the sale, which was obtained by ESPN.com's Marc Stein, and said, "If the transaction is consummated, it will represent a very positive step toward ending a very unfortunate time for our league."

"As opposed to an owner who notoriously invested little in his team over the years, the proposed new owner is one who, based on his pedigree, history and the investment he already has pledged to make in the franchise, should be an innovator and a contributor," Klempner wrote. "Not just in terms of his approach to players, but generally in the manner in which he is expected to market the team and the product."

Klempner said the sale illustrated the "superb" economic condition of the league and how the union was "proud to have stood together as players against the divisive language and actions that led to this situation."

ESPN3

Jay Carney

Eva Green

Chicago Blackhawks

WildStar

Parlor game: What's next for Jay Carney - Politico

White House press secretaries hustle for the president. Then a lot of them go on to do the same thing for special interests.

The Washington parlor game Friday: Will outgoing press secretary Jay Carney do the same?

Continue Reading

Since the start of the Clinton administration, five of the last nine press secretaries landed softly in the world of corporate communications for a large multinational company or with a public affairs firm.

(QUIZ: How well do you know Jay Carney?)

The lucrative line of work relies on in-town connections and insider knowledge of an administration. It looks and feels a lot like lobbying — just don’t call it that, since none of the formal rules apply.

Obama announced Friday that Carney will step down from the podium in June. And while it is unclear what Carney will do next, many insiders say that if he wants to join the world of influence, he certainly could.

“Press secretaries by definition have a public affairs background that would lead them into that kind of civilian position,” said Marlin Fitzwater, who served as press secretary for both George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. As a result, press secretaries tend to go work for “either with companies that are hiring public affairs people, or Washington PR firms who want the combination of public relation experience plus access to the White House or government in general,” he said.

(Also on POLITICO: Twitter lights up at Carney announcement)

Clinton press secretary Jake Siewert now serves as global head of corporate communications for Goldman Sachs, after doing a stint at Alcoa. Dee Dee Myers recently accepted a job to head communications for Warner Bros. She also did a stint consulting for the hit NBC show “The West Wing.”

And the public affairs field — a cross between public relations and lobbying — is crowded with ex-White House spokespersons.

Carney’s predecessor Robert Gibbs founded The Incite Agency with Obama campaign press secretary Ben LaBolt. (Obama famously called Gibbs’ $172,000-a-year salary as White House press secretary “modest” in an interview with The New York Times.)

Clinton White House press secretary Mike McCurry works at the lobbying and public affairs firm Public Strategies Washington — whose CEO and founder recently played a round of golf with Obama.

(WATCH: Best of Jay Carney)

Myers and fellow former Clinton spokesman Joe Lockhart have long been affiliated with the Glover Park Group — a huge public relations, public affairs and lobbying operation that does work for corporate and nonprofit clients. Lockhart co-founded the firm, while Myers served as a managing director until recently. Lockhart also did a stint at Facebook before returning to the firm he founded in 2013.

The one thing White House press secretaries have largely avoided? Outright lobbying. Though the Glover Park Group has a lobbying arm, Myers and Lockhart have never registered to lobby. McCurry registered to lobby briefly during his stint at Public Strategies in 2006 to represent a coalition called Hands Off The Internet. Other than that, White House press secretaries have stayed away from K Street.

“I’d say the skill sets are similar — in that you have to have a good grasp of policy, to know the different variations and nuances of the various policies that are being discussed. But the audiences are different,” said David Urban, a veteran Republican lobbyist with the bipartisan firm American Continental Group.

Urban said that most press secretaries have no affinity for working the halls of Capitol Hill and schmoozing members of Congress. Their interests are usually in framing issues and developing a media plan for clients. That’s a similar skill set to what lobbyists do — but a different tactical approach.

“I just think it’s the same highway — but different side,” Urban said.

But critics say that public affairs and public relations can essentially be unregistered lobbying — especially when done on behalf of corporate clients or special interest groups.

“Public affairs is providing that sort of communication to officeholders that is often done on behalf of special interests. It really is a form of lobbying,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the watchdog group Public Citizen. “It’s a very natural revolving door.”

And the rise of White House press secretaries to superstardom in Washington, D.C., is a recent phenomenon.

“I did not find that press secretaries generally get offered big jobs or big salaries because of their experience,” said Fitzwater, the veteran of the Bush and Reagan White Houses. In his day, companies weren’t necessarily hunting for candidates with deep levels of Washington experience.

“They didn’t see presidential press secretary experience germane to the way that they run their businesses,” he said.

And certainly the world of influence is not Carney’s only option.

One former White House press secretary told POLITICO that offers for paid speaking engagements, book deals, corporate and public relations job offers and even opportunities in Hollywood start rolling in almost immediately.

Carney, a former Time magazine reporter, could also follow in the footsteps of Dana Perino and George Stephanopoulos — both of whom have become full-time media personalities after their stints behind the podium.

Either way, Carney, 49, is likely to have his pick of career options as he ponders his next big move.

“It was surreal,” recalled former George W. Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer. Upon announcing his resignation in 2003, he was flooded with opportunities and engagements — all before his departure was even finalized.

“I had faxes offering me paid speeches. I had a fax from a publisher offering a huge advance for a book,” Fleischer said. “Some Hollywood people called me and talked to me about becoming my agents.”

Fleischer said that celebrities and big shots who never would have taken notice of him prior to his White House days came calling about opportunities of all kinds — from film to books to speaking gigs to jobs.

Fleischer ended up taking a different path than many former White House flacks. He left Washington, D.C., to found a sports communications firm headquartered in White Plains, N.Y. He’s represented Major League Baseball, the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour, the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association and several major sports figures — helping with their crisis communications, image management and media needs.

Blackhawks

OTF Nunu

Miami Heat

Miami Heat

Lauren Scruggs

Heat's Finals Push All About Pride, History - Bleacher Report

MIAMI — What greeted Erik Spoelstra on Thursday wouldn't be welcome in any other walk of life, but it was what he wanted to see. What he needed to see. What was absent at times in months that mattered less. What was essential to get to the month that matters most. 

"A very angry group," the coach said.

What were they angry about? Too much to chronicle quickly.

They were angry about the peripheral stuff, for sure, the stuff they couldn't control. Lance Stephenson's buffoonery. The officials' inconsistency. The Pacers' impropriety, their tendency during two years—and three postseasons—to talk much, much, much too much. 

They were angry most of all at themselves, for letting it get this far. 

"We knew we were better than this team," Ray Allen said. "But we still had to play at our best. Everybody just focused in and wanted to beat them. Whether you could talk about any individual player's antics out there on the floor... just dial in. Just dial in and stay focused. Don't allow for it to get to the point where they have control of this game on our floor. Just take it away from them early and do it often." 

Play their best, which is something they hadn't done all that often this season.

Prove they're better, which is something they've believed all along, no matter their seeding. 

"I believed, if we ever got a point where our whole team was able to be available for Spo and for all of us, that we could compete with anybody," LeBron James said. "Never concerned about that." 

Heat 117, Pacers 92.

Heat four, Pacers two. 

Four straight NBA Finals, with that series to start on Thursday. 

This was their best.

This was why they're better. 

This is where they can go, when they care.

"It was funny, talking to (Greg Oden) and Toney (Douglas), guys who haven't been around," Shane Battier said. "They were like, 'Who are you guys? This is not a team I've seen all year.' We said, hey, stay around long enough, stay around long enough, and you'll see a different team. Trust me, we're not bad. We're not bad when we play hard. Really, that's been the story of our team." 

That's a team the Pacers still can't touch.

"I think it's about not being able to reach their level," Pacers coach Frank Vogel said. "Yet." 

If "yets" and "ifs" and "buts" were nuts, then, well, they'd be Lance Stephenson. But they also feel stale at this stage, since Vogel's team said many of those same things 360 days earlier, when it lost the second of three series to the Heat. That night, after getting routed by 23, the Pacers spoke of their promise. ("The great thing is we're a young team and we are past the building stage," Paul George said then. "This is really our first year tasting success. The rate we are going, we see championships soon.") And they committed to capturing the top seed in the East, as a means of avoiding another elimination game on the road against a team they'd been built to beat.

They made it their mission to get Game 7 on their floor. 

But, first, because of a home loss in Game 2, they needed to survive Game 6 in South Florida. They needed to survive the switch. 

The Pacers led 9-2 early before the beating began, one that Ramsay Snow would have considered cruel. The Heat allowed just five points in the final eight minutes of the first quarter, while scoring 22. That was just a precursor to the pain to follow, with Miami outscoring the Pacers by an obscene 84-40 count from that inauspicious opening, and Vogel calling more timeouts than a kindergarten teacher.

Actually, he might have felt like one this season, dealing with bruised and inflated egos, and with fractures in the locker room that will likely become more apparent in the offseason x-ray.

But on this night, none of that was the primary problem.

Not Roy Hibbert's no-show, with just one field goal, and just four rebounds, his 10th playoff game with five or fewer of the latter. Not Stephenson's silliness, which included cupping James' chin ("uncalled for," James said), flagrant fouling Norris Cole and confronting Chris Andersen, a series of antics that caused Udonis Haslem to threaten him from the bench, with James smartly holding Haslem back.

Not George's tardiness, as the Pacers' signature star followed up a 2-of-9 struggle in Game 7 of the 2013 Eastern Conference finals by scoring just one point in the first half, before tallying 28 more with the contest decided. Not David West, the Pacers' rock, suddenly sailing passes out of bounds.

No, none of it.

The primary problem was in the home whites. The Pacers weren't winning on this night, regardless. There was no way the bloodthirsty Heat would allow it. 

Not after they'd been roused. Roused by history, and the opportunity to reach a fourth straight NBA Finals, something no team since the 1987 Celtics of Parish-McHale-Bird-Ainge-Johnson had done. Roused by idiocy, the sort Stephenson had to spare, even Spoelstra wouldn't identify that as inspiration.

"To even point out, to make a comment about that, then you're just highlighting that guy," Spoelstra said. "So he had nothing to do with our series, our success in this series, how LeBron showed up tonight. We're playing for something much bigger than that guy." 

They're playing for themselves, for who they believe they are, and what they want to accomplish.

So, you could say that, after an uneven season, they were mostly roused by pride. Chris Bosh's pride not to allow Hibbert to dominate the paint the way he did last postseason: "I really took the personal challenge to do a better job." And he did, not only defensively, but by breaking out offensively in the final three games, and throwing in a few fistpumps.

Chris Andersen's pride to prove he could have, should have played in the past couple games, even with a bruised thigh; he provided nine points and 10 rebounds in 13 minutes on Friday. 

And then? 

"He got pretty angry with me in the fourth quarter for taking him out," Spoelstra said. "Telling me I'm holding him back."

Dwyane Wade's pride to push himself through a rigorous program, to prove that he is still a worthy championship sidekick. Shane Battier's pride, and Ray Allen's pride, and Rashard Lewis' pride, to prove they still have something left to give. 

"There isn't an article written about us that doesn't mention our aging role players," Battier said. 

James' pride to keep working towards becoming the best there ever was. 

"We're competing against the Michael Jordan of our era, the Chicago Bulls of our era," Vogel said.

James smiled when told of that statement. 

"Me and D-Wade grew up watching the great Chicago Bulls team and the great Michael Jordan and the rest of those guys," he said, after posting an efficient 25 points, plus six assists. "Any time I hear my name or our team in the same breath with legends and great teams and franchises, it's so humbling, man. I really don't know...."

And in the end, it really doesn't matter if we know exactly what it was that got them so furious and focused—that got them to flip that switch, and turn out Indiana's lights. 

All that matters is where the Heat ended up.

Again.

In the NBA Finals.

Where they always believed they'd be.

ESPN3

Miami Heat

Phil Mickelson

Lance Stephenson

Miami Heat